Singapore vs Hong Kong Fund Formation: An Asia-Pacific Comparison
Singapore and Hong Kong are the two premier onshore fund jurisdictions in Asia-Pacific, each offering sophisticated regulatory frameworks, deep talent pools, and access to Asian capital. Singapore's Variable Capital Company (VCC) framework, introduced in 2020, has rapidly gained traction with over 1,000 VCCs established, while Hong Kong's Open-Ended Fund Company (OFC) and Limited Partnership Fund (LPF) regimes provide competitive alternatives. Together they domicile the majority of Asia-Pacific's alternative investment fund assets. Choosing between them depends on your investor base, strategy focus, regulatory preferences, and long-term platform ambitions.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Factor | Singapore | Hong Kong |
|---|---|---|
| Regulator | Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) | Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) |
| Fund Structures | VCC (Variable Capital Company), LP | OFC (Open-Ended Fund Company), LPF (Limited Partnership Fund) |
| Manager License | Capital Markets Services (CMS) License / RFMC / A-RNSE | Type 9 (Asset Management) License |
| Setup Time | 4-6 weeks (VCC); 2-4 weeks (LP) | 4-8 weeks (OFC/LPF); Type 9 license: 3-6 months |
| Tax Incentives | Section 13O, 13U, 13D exemptions | Unified Fund Exemption |
| Substance Requirements | Fund management activities must be in Singapore | Key investment functions in Hong Kong |
| Min. Fund Size (for tax exemptions) | SGD 10M (Section 13O); SGD 50M (Section 13U) | No minimum (Unified Fund Exemption) |
| Annual Costs | Higher (compliance, service providers) | Moderate |
| China Access | Indirect (diplomatic neutrality) | Direct (Stock Connect, Bond Connect, GBA) |
| Institutional Reputation | Very strong, politically neutral | Very strong, Greater China gateway |
| Best For | Southeast Asia focus, family offices, multi-strategy | Greater China strategies, global hedge funds, Hong Kong-based teams |
Key Differences
China Access
Hong Kong's most significant advantage is its direct connectivity to mainland China through Stock Connect, Bond Connect, Wealth Management Connect, and the Greater Bay Area (GBA) initiatives. For strategies focused on Chinese equities, fixed income, or Greater China opportunities, Hong Kong provides unmatched market access.
Singapore offers indirect China access through diplomatic and economic relationships but lacks the direct market connectivity infrastructure that Hong Kong provides.
Tax Incentive Frameworks
Singapore: Offers three fund tax exemption schemes — Section 13O (onshore fund, minimum SGD 10M AUM, Singapore-based fund manager), Section 13U (enhanced tier, minimum SGD 50M AUM), and Section 13D (offshore fund, no minimum). These provide full exemption from Singapore tax on specified investment income. The Section 13O scheme requires annual spending of at least SGD 200,000 in Singapore and hiring at least 2 investment professionals.
Hong Kong: The Unified Fund Exemption provides profits tax exemption for qualifying funds that meet specified conditions. Unlike Singapore, there is no minimum fund size requirement for the exemption.
Family Office Ecosystem
Singapore has aggressively positioned itself as a global family office hub, with over 1,400 family offices established as of 2025 according to MAS data. The tax incentive schemes (particularly Section 13O) have driven significant capital inflows from Asian, Middle Eastern, and European family offices. Hong Kong's family office ecosystem is growing but remains smaller.
Regulatory Approach
MAS is known for thorough, principles-based regulation with clear guidelines. The licensing process for fund managers (CMS License) is comprehensive but well-documented, typically taking 3-6 months.
SFC maintains rigorous standards with a focus on investor protection. The Type 9 Asset Management license process is similarly thorough, taking 3-6 months. The SFC has been proactive in developing frameworks for virtual assets and ESG requirements.
When to Choose Singapore
- Southeast Asian investment focus
- Family office or multi-family office structure
- Desire for political neutrality and geographic diversification from Hong Kong
- Access to MAS tax incentive schemes (particularly for qualifying fund sizes)
- VCC structure benefits (umbrella sub-funds, variable capital, re-domiciliation)
- Building an Asia-Pacific hub with plans for multi-strategy expansion
When to Choose Hong Kong
- Greater China investment strategy (equities, fixed income, PE/VC)
- Existing team and operations in Hong Kong
- Direct market access through Stock Connect/Bond Connect required
- LP base includes Hong Kong-based or China-linked institutional investors
- Hedge fund strategy requiring Hong Kong market infrastructure
- LPF structure for PE/VC (designed for closed-ended strategies)
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I have a Singapore VCC managed from Hong Kong, or vice versa?
A Singapore VCC must be managed by a Singapore-based fund manager (CMS license holder or exempt manager). Cross-border management is not permitted — the fund management activities must be conducted from Singapore. Similarly, Hong Kong OFCs must be managed by an SFC-licensed manager. However, delegation of specific functions (e.g., sub-advisory arrangements) is possible in both jurisdictions.
Which is better for a first-time manager?
Singapore's Registered Fund Management Company (RFMC) regime allows qualifying managers with AUM below SGD 250M to operate with lighter regulatory requirements, making it attractive for emerging managers. Hong Kong does not have an equivalent light-touch licensing tier — all fund managers require a full Type 9 license. For first-time managers, Singapore may offer a faster and less expensive path to launch.
What is a VCC and why does it matter?
The Variable Capital Company is Singapore's purpose-built fund vehicle, introduced in 2020. Key advantages include: umbrella structure allowing multiple sub-funds within a single entity, variable capital (shares issued/redeemed at NAV without court approval), enhanced privacy (investor register not publicly accessible), and the ability to re-domicile existing funds from other jurisdictions into Singapore.
Which jurisdiction has lower ongoing costs?
Operating costs are broadly comparable, though Singapore's compliance costs can be higher due to the substance requirements for tax incentive schemes (minimum local spending, local employees). Hong Kong has no equivalent mandatory local spending requirements. Legal and administration costs are similar in both cities.
Next Steps
Singapore and Hong Kong each offer compelling advantages for Asia-Pacific fund formation. The right choice depends on your investment strategy, LP geography, and where your team is based.
Sources: MAS Annual Report; SFC Annual Report; MAS Family Office Statistics; Singapore VCC Registry; Hong Kong OFC/LPF Registry.
About the Author
Adi SharmaTrainee at Fundtec
Adi Sharma is a Trainee at Fundtec. She holds a bachelor's degree in commerce with a strong academic foundation in financial concepts and reporting. Adi has a keen interest in financial technology and data-driven decision-making, and focuses on exploring how automation and emerging technologies are transforming investment fund operations.
View all articles